Performance Tracking > 2025 Hurricane Season
Average Uptime for the whole period
Best regards, and takeITeasy™ with WebSitePulse™
Iavor Marinoff, CEO
Report Methodology:
WebSitePulse Performance Reports measure Uptime and Response Time as the most important metrics for the availability and the reliability of any web-based operation. Performance measurement took place daily, every 15 minutes during the entire Hurricane season, between the hours of 6AM and 3AM EST. The WebSitePulse website monitoring service was used to collect data and to create the reports.
The simultaneous monitoring is performed from 3 US locations of the WebSitePulse monitoring network: Trumbull, CT, San Francisco, CA and Chicago, IL. In case of a detected malfunction or unavailability, the system performs automated error verification from 3 independent resources and only after the above procedure is performed and has returned consistent results, the detected error is confirmed, recorded, and included in the daily performance reports. In these cases, an advanced WebSitePulse exclusive feature comes into play - Forced Monitoring - which automatically switches to a 3 minute - monitoring interval for increased accuracy.
About WebSitePulse:
WebSitePulse is a leading provider of global, independent, and objective availability and performance monitoring of web sites, servers, network components, web applications, e-business- and email round-trip transactions.
Contact:
For more information about this report please contact:
George T., CTO
phone: 1-407-380-1600
email:
Reproduction:
WebSitePulse launched the Performance and Uptime Reports program to keep the general public and the Internet community informed about the performance of specific websites and the challenges their webmasters, owners and operators are facing on a daily basis, especially when the web traffic intensifies due to some special events through the year. Some of the most popular web destinations, related to each particular event, are selected for the purpose of the Reports, and data from their performance measurements is made available on the WebSitePulse public website.
With the intention to broadly disseminate this information for the benefit of the Internet community, we encourage the use of this information without prior approval and under the following Terms and Conditions:
The Data from the performance measurements cannot be changed or manipulated and should be used "as is".
WebSitePulse 2025 Hurricane Season Web Performance Report Summary
The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season has ended. It began on June 1 and ends on November 30. So far,
13 tropical cyclones have formed, all becoming named storms. Five reached hurricane strength, and
four became major hurricanes. The season’s ACE index stands at about 130.2, showing above-
average activity.
The season started late with Tropical Storm Andrea on June 23, followed by Barry and Chantal, all of which were short-lived due to Saharan dust and unfavorable conditions. Activity increased in August with Hurricane Erin, the first Category 5 storm, followed by a rare three-week lull during peak season. Hurricane Gabrielle revived activity in mid-September, and later that month, Humberto and Imelda formed, both powerful, with Humberto also reaching Category 5.
In October, storms Jerry, Karen, and Lorenzo formed, culminating in Hurricane Melissa, which became the third Category 5 hurricane and one of the strongest Atlantic hurricanes on record. Overall, 2025 is notable for its late start, long midseason lull, and three Category 5 hurricanes, second only to 2005.
In 2025, in the Atlantic basin, we observed the following:
The season began early with Tropical Storm Alvin on May 28, followed by several June storms, including Hurricane Erick, the earliest major hurricane on record to make landfall in Mexico. Flossie, Dalila, and Erick became the earliest fourth, fifth, and sixth named storms since 1960. In late July, Hurricane Iona and Tropical Storm Keli formed in the Central Pacific, followed by Hurricane Gil. August saw four more systems, Henriette, Ivo, Juliette, and Kiko, mostly staying offshore. September brought Lorena, Mario, Narda, and Octave, while October featured Hurricane Priscilla, Tropical Storm Raymond, and Sonia, which brought heavy rain to parts of Mexico and the U.S. Southwest.
Overall, the 2025 season was active and early, marked by record-setting storm formation and several powerful hurricanes affecting Mexico and the Pacific basin. In 2025, in the Pacific basin, we observed the following:
For this Performance Report, we at WebSitePulse monitoring service measured the websites' home pages' performance and complete interaction with the website as an end-user would do. The report measures Uptime and Response Time as the most critical metrics for the availability and reliability of all web-based operations. Measurements of multi-step online transactions were taken every 15 minutes simultaneously from 3 monitoring locations: Trumbull, CT (US East Coast), San Francisco, CA (US West Coast), and Chicago, IL (US Central).
The overall uptime and speed of the monitored weather websites were quite good during the whole period, except for trackthetropics.com. We found that the daily average response time for all monitored websites was 0.570 sec. which is 0.013 sec. faster than last year's. The daily average responses by location are as follows:
Compared to last year's performance, the two leaders increased their response time by an average of 0.075 seconds, while the slowest site this year performed on average 0.397 seconds faster than in the 2024 Hurricane Season monitored period.
The daily average uptime for the five websites for the 2025 hurricane season was 99.996%. The daily average uptime by location is as follows:
Average Response times for the whole periodThe season started late with Tropical Storm Andrea on June 23, followed by Barry and Chantal, all of which were short-lived due to Saharan dust and unfavorable conditions. Activity increased in August with Hurricane Erin, the first Category 5 storm, followed by a rare three-week lull during peak season. Hurricane Gabrielle revived activity in mid-September, and later that month, Humberto and Imelda formed, both powerful, with Humberto also reaching Category 5.
In October, storms Jerry, Karen, and Lorenzo formed, culminating in Hurricane Melissa, which became the third Category 5 hurricane and one of the strongest Atlantic hurricanes on record. Overall, 2025 is notable for its late start, long midseason lull, and three Category 5 hurricanes, second only to 2005.
In 2025, in the Atlantic basin, we observed the following:
- 1 Subtropical storm (Karen)
- 7 Tropical storms (Andrea, Barry, Chantal, Dexter, Fernand, Jerry, and Lorenzo)
- 1 Category 2 hurricane (Imelda)
- 1 Category 4 hurricane (Gabrielle)
- 3 Category 5 hurricanes (Erin, Humberto, and Melissa)
The season began early with Tropical Storm Alvin on May 28, followed by several June storms, including Hurricane Erick, the earliest major hurricane on record to make landfall in Mexico. Flossie, Dalila, and Erick became the earliest fourth, fifth, and sixth named storms since 1960. In late July, Hurricane Iona and Tropical Storm Keli formed in the Central Pacific, followed by Hurricane Gil. August saw four more systems, Henriette, Ivo, Juliette, and Kiko, mostly staying offshore. September brought Lorena, Mario, Narda, and Octave, while October featured Hurricane Priscilla, Tropical Storm Raymond, and Sonia, which brought heavy rain to parts of Mexico and the U.S. Southwest.
Overall, the 2025 season was active and early, marked by record-setting storm formation and several powerful hurricanes affecting Mexico and the Pacific basin. In 2025, in the Pacific basin, we observed the following:
- 9 Tropical storms (Alvin, Cosme, Dalila, Keli, Ivo, Juliette, Mario, Raymond, and Sonia)
- 5 Category 1 hurricanes (Barbara, Gil, Henriette, Lorena, and Octave)
- 2 Category 2 hurricanes (Narda and Priscilla)
- 2 Category 3 hurricanes (Flossie and Iona)
- 2 Category 4 hurricanes (Erick and Kiko)
For this Performance Report, we at WebSitePulse monitoring service measured the websites' home pages' performance and complete interaction with the website as an end-user would do. The report measures Uptime and Response Time as the most critical metrics for the availability and reliability of all web-based operations. Measurements of multi-step online transactions were taken every 15 minutes simultaneously from 3 monitoring locations: Trumbull, CT (US East Coast), San Francisco, CA (US West Coast), and Chicago, IL (US Central).
The overall uptime and speed of the monitored weather websites were quite good during the whole period, except for trackthetropics.com. We found that the daily average response time for all monitored websites was 0.570 sec. which is 0.013 sec. faster than last year's. The daily average responses by location are as follows:
- Trumbull, CT (US East Coast) – 0.562 sec
- San Francisco, CA (US West Coast) – 0.678 sec
- Chicago, IL (US Central) – 0.469 sec
Compared to last year's performance, the two leaders increased their response time by an average of 0.075 seconds, while the slowest site this year performed on average 0.397 seconds faster than in the 2024 Hurricane Season monitored period.
The daily average uptime for the five websites for the 2025 hurricane season was 99.996%. The daily average uptime by location is as follows:
- Trumbull, CT (US East Coast) – 99.994%
- San Francisco, CA (US West Coast) – 99.996%
- Chicago, IL (US Central) – 99.997%
| # | Target | Trumbull, CT | San Francisco, CA | Chicago, IL | Avg. resp. time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | redcross.org | 0.284 | 0.130 | 0.182 | 0.199 |
| 2 | nhc.noaa.gov | 0.332 | 0.628 | 0.249 | 0.403 |
| 3 | tropicalstormrisk.com | 0.507 | 0.854 | 0.496 | 0.619 |
| 4 | floridadisaster.org | 0.682 | 0.733 | 0.623 | 0.679 |
| 5 | nesdis.noaa.gov | 0.836 | 0.926 | 0.402 | 0.721 |
| 6 | weather.com | 0.732 | 0.797 | 0.865 | 0.798 |
Average Uptime for the whole period
| # | Target | Trumbull, CT | San Francisco, CA | Chicago, IL | Avg. uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | redcross.org | 100.000% | 100.000% | 100.000% | 100.000% |
| 2 | nesdis.noaa.gov | 100.000% | 100.000% | 100.000% | 100.000% |
| 3 | nhc.noaa.gov | 99.998% | 100.000% | 100.000% | 99.999% |
| 4 | tropicalstormrisk.com | 100.000% | 99.997% | 99.996% | 99.998% |
| 5 | weather.com | 99.989% | 100.000% | 100.000% | 99.996% |
| 6 | floridadisaster.org | 99.980% | 99.981% | 99.986% | 99.982% |
Best regards, and takeITeasy™ with WebSitePulse™
Iavor Marinoff, CEO
Report Methodology:
WebSitePulse Performance Reports measure Uptime and Response Time as the most important metrics for the availability and the reliability of any web-based operation. Performance measurement took place daily, every 15 minutes during the entire Hurricane season, between the hours of 6AM and 3AM EST. The WebSitePulse website monitoring service was used to collect data and to create the reports.
The simultaneous monitoring is performed from 3 US locations of the WebSitePulse monitoring network: Trumbull, CT, San Francisco, CA and Chicago, IL. In case of a detected malfunction or unavailability, the system performs automated error verification from 3 independent resources and only after the above procedure is performed and has returned consistent results, the detected error is confirmed, recorded, and included in the daily performance reports. In these cases, an advanced WebSitePulse exclusive feature comes into play - Forced Monitoring - which automatically switches to a 3 minute - monitoring interval for increased accuracy.
About WebSitePulse:
WebSitePulse is a leading provider of global, independent, and objective availability and performance monitoring of web sites, servers, network components, web applications, e-business- and email round-trip transactions.
Contact:
For more information about this report please contact:
George T., CTO
phone: 1-407-380-1600
email:
Reproduction:
WebSitePulse launched the Performance and Uptime Reports program to keep the general public and the Internet community informed about the performance of specific websites and the challenges their webmasters, owners and operators are facing on a daily basis, especially when the web traffic intensifies due to some special events through the year. Some of the most popular web destinations, related to each particular event, are selected for the purpose of the Reports, and data from their performance measurements is made available on the WebSitePulse public website.
With the intention to broadly disseminate this information for the benefit of the Internet community, we encourage the use of this information without prior approval and under the following Terms and Conditions:
- WebSitePulse should be referred as the "Source" of the information;
- WebSitePulse should be acknowledged as the owner of the copyrights of the information in the Reports;
- The texts of the Reports could be changed or altered to better suit the needs and the style of the publisher without prior notice to WebSitePulse. However, the integrity and the meaning of the information should be preserved;
The Data from the performance measurements cannot be changed or manipulated and should be used "as is".
